Sunday, 27 January 2013

The Press

‘‘We Must Do Something About The Media’’


Ace:

...What we are witnessing is the full and seamless fusion of media power with government power.
...
[Today] the media considers its adversarial function to consist of serving as adversaries to critics of Obama and the Democrats; thus Terry Moran shaming himself by rushing out to ask what right a Senator has to question the Secretary of State on matters of foreign policy.

They do not consider themselves required to exert any adversarial pressure on governmental power itself...

This is dark, and dangerous, and will lead to horrors.  It always has led to horrors before.
Meanwhile: From Europe, a very ‘‘European’’ approach:
A group reporting to the European Commission has recommended the regulation of the media and bloggers. It also called for the creation of several new regulatory apparatus for fining, monitoring and chivvying the Press.
...
‘‘Fair legal regulation is necessary, balancing the new dimension of freedom of expression and the justified rights and interests of other citizens,’’ the group declared in a new report.

‘‘Any new regulatory frameworks must be brought into line with the new reality of a fluid media environment, covering all types of journalistic activities, regardless of the transmission medium.’’

Then the report’s writers take a sharp turn into suggested punishments for hacks who irritate the powers that be, namely fines, grovelling apologies and the ability to stop reporters from doing their job:
All EU countries should have independent media councils. Media councils should have real enforcement powers, such as the imposition of fines, orders for printed or broadcast apologies, or removal of journalistic status.
...
The report recommends the creation of a ‘‘European fundamental rights agency’’ with ‘‘a monitoring role of national-level freedom and pluralism of the media’’.  In addition, we’re told ‘‘a network of national audio-visual regulatory authorities should be created, on the model of the one created by the electronic communications framework.  It would help in sharing common good practices and set quality standards’’.
...
The high-level group [also] told member states that taxpayers should bail out incompetent or irrelevant media businesses, although naturally there would be a beauty contest first (the emphasis is ours):
There should be a provision of state funding for media which are essential for pluralism (including geographical, linguistic, cultural and political pluralism), but are not commercially viable.  The state should intervene whenever there is a market failure leading to the under-provision of pluralism, which should be considered as a key public good.
...
The aforementioned proposals are the tip of an iceberg...
The Europeans are waiting for a mandate.  The Americans have already volunteered.


Related:
Gateway Pundit (via Insty):  ABC’s ‘‘This Week’’ Has [Democrat] Sen. Menendez On For Entire Segment – Forgets to Ask About Underage Hooker Scandal
You could imagine the grilling this man would have taken if he had an ‘R’ behind his name insted of a ‘D’.  Instead, ABC willfully keeps the public in the dark.
Althouse:
The N[ew] Y[ork] T[imes] portrays the folks back home in West Virginia as misinformed, troublesome, and hysterical.  That’s what we’re dealing with.

Posted by: Old Grouch in The Press at 20:48:43 GMT | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 500 words, total size 6 kb.

Monday, 31 December 2012

The Press

Call ’em on it

That goes double  Dept.
...Dude, the fact that you’re angry doesn’t give you some sort of a pass from the norms of civil society.  Or, if it does, be prepared to tolerate a lot of things that you’ll find intolerable.  Because, you know, a lot of people are angry. - Glenn Reynolds
What I want to to know is whether ‘‘t[ying politicians]... to the back of a Chevy pickup truck and drag[ging] them around a parking lot until they [see] the light...’’ is viewed as acceptable by the Des Moines Register, and whether they (and their parent, Gannett Corporation) believe the same treatment would be fair if meted out to our less-enlightened newspaper editors and columnists.

Just to establish some boundaries, you know.

RELATED, update (130101 02:00):

Posted by: Old Grouch in The Press at 17:19:33 GMT | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 154 words, total size 3 kb.

Friday, 23 November 2012

The Press

You *could* stop right there...


Glenn Reynolds:

Could it be that the Editorial Board of the Washington Post is a pack of pathetic political hacks
Yes.

Oh wait, he’s not finished...
...pathetic political hacks who’ll engage in racial hate speech in order to advance the White House’s agenda?
‘‘...the White House’s Democrat agenda...’’ FIFY: Offer void when White House is occupied by a Republican.
Apparently, whole swathes of the electorate are illegitimate just because of their birth.  If you really believe that, you’re doing more to promote division than anyone who signs a dumb White House petition for secession. Disgraceful.
They really do believe.  As I said, yes.

LATER,
elsewhere (121124):
William Jacobson has doubts:
Does the Editorial Board of The Washington Post even belief what it writes?  I doubt it.  It’s all part of their race card game.

Posted by: Old Grouch in The Press at 16:30:35 GMT | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 133 words, total size 2 kb.

Tuesday, 30 October 2012

The Press

...we’d be getting stories like these.

It’s all how you look at it...  Dept
If the mainstream media was based in the South:
  • "Should we pay to rebuild NYC?”
  • "If a Cat 1 does this what is going to happen when it gets hit by a real hurricane?”
  • "What were these people thinking building all this stuff right on the coast?”
  • "What idiots stayed behind when they were told to evacuate?”

Posted by: Old Grouch in The Press at 15:00:56 GMT | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 71 words, total size 1 kb.

Wednesday, 24 October 2012

The Press

Why not? After all, they hired Walter Duranty...


Tom Maguire:


(via Glenn)

Posted by: Old Grouch in The Press at 17:24:11 GMT | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 19 words, total size 1 kb.

Monday, 17 September 2012

The Press

Fifth Columnists


Mark Steyn

Elderly Soviet propagandists must be wondering why they wasted their time jamming radio transmitters and smashing printing presses when they could just have sent everyone to Columbia Journalism School.

Via: Kate

Posted by: Old Grouch in The Press at 01:54:17 GMT | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 34 words, total size 1 kb.

Saturday, 08 September 2012

The Press

When it comes to “Fast and Furious,” blame Bush...

AP="Always Partisan”  Dept
The Associated Press:
Mexican federal police announced Friday that they have arrested a suspect in the killing of U.S. Border Patrol agent Brian Terry, the slaying at the center of the scandal over the botched U.S. gun-smuggling probe known as Operation Fast and Furious.
...
In Operation Fast and Furious and at least three earlier probes during the administration of President George W. Bush, agents in Arizona employed a risky tactic called gun-walking...
Andy at Ace Of Spades notes:
Guess whose names they don't mention in the entire article.
But the failure here goes beyond not mentioning anyone named Barak Obama or Eric Holder: AP’s (intentionally?) sloppy language seems tailored to leave the impression that Operation Fast and Furious and the "three earlier probes” were all Bush-administration operations.

There’s nothing like journalistic accuracy.  Too bad this is nothing like journalistic accuracy.


UPDATE, related (120915, 15:30):

Posted by: Old Grouch in The Press at 16:17:30 GMT | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 157 words, total size 2 kb.

Saturday, 04 August 2012

The Press

Pushing the liberal agenda...

Just (leave out all) the facts...  Dept
Big Journalism:
"Legitimate Voters Blocked by Photo ID Laws” read the headline of a July 10 Associated Press article. Sounds pretty damning.  It turns out, though, that the article lacked key information about [the] two Indiana voters that might have changed the whole tenor of the story.  The reporter, Mike Baker, failed to reveal that the voters in question actually have photo IDs and have used them in previous elections.
Whoops!  And they also have passports (which work as voter IDs in Indiana).  And the two are also over 65, meaning they could have voted absentee without an ID.  And they were actually allowed to vote provisionally, as the law provides.  Etc., etc,

None of which were included in Baker’s report.

Anyone surprised by this?  Anyone at all?

Via Gary Welsh, who notes:
This is yet another example of why you simply cannot trust anything you read in the mainstream media any more.  These reporters have a leftist agenda, and they won’t allow the facts to get in the way of their predetermined narrative, even if that requires reporting outright lies to the public.

Posted by: Old Grouch in The Press at 17:57:35 GMT | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 191 words, total size 2 kb.

Tuesday, 31 July 2012

The Press

Hey NBC, thin skin, huh...?

#NBCFail  Dept


and so much for freedom of speech...

Elsewhere:
The Independent:  (Now) NBC claims it’s all Twitter’s fault...
Jeff Jarvis:
...the real issue here is that Twitter entered a business deal with NBC and its parent, Comcast, for the Olympics.  That, in Adams’ word, puts NBC and Twitter in cahoots with each other.  So now do other users have to worry about biting the hand that feeds Twitter?
Dan Gillmor:  Is Twitter’s Suspension of Journalist’s Account a Defining Moment?

Later (120731 22:05):
(Via Ace sidebar.)

Posted by: Old Grouch in The Press at 17:39:53 GMT | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 109 words, total size 3 kb.

Saturday, 28 July 2012

The Press

Dear NBC Olympics “commentators”


Please STFU.

Thank you,
O.G.


(Last night’s opening broadcast was like watching a movie while seated between a couple of clowns on cell phones describing every moment to their buddies on the other end.  Catchphrase: "As you just said...”  Ugh.)

Elsewhere:
ScreenRant:
Continuously cutting to commercials throughout, the subtle, nuanced program that Danny Boyle planned out was all but eviscerated, as a need to recoup some of the money spent on the Olympic rights took its toll on a ceremony that the world was raving about just hours before.

NPR’s Monkey See blog:
The ability of an American television audience to enjoy the ceremonies was hampered by several things: flawed (and unrelenting) commentary, a tape-delay that prevented us from watching at the same time on both coasts, let alone at the same time as the rest of the world, and editing that apparently excised some of the content.

Deadspin:
The major transitional element of today’s London Olympics opening ceremony was a downtempo performance of adoptive sporting anthem "Abide With Me” by Scottish singer Emeli Sandé.  The song and accompanying dance were a tribute to the victims of the 7/7 terror attacks in London that claimed 52 victims days after the 2012 Summer Olympic hosts were named.  (It's also been suggested the performance was a memorial to the war dead.)

Regardless, it was a rather significant and emotional moment in the opening ceremony, coming just before the parade of nations—and it wasn’t aired in the United States.  Instead, viewers were treated to a lengthy and meaningless Ryan Seacrest interview of Michael Phelps.

Heidi Moore [NPR Marketplace bureau chief]:
NBC [is] making an incredible bid for gold medal for Stupidest Network Ever.  No livestreaming, no broadcast, just pretending it doesn’t exist.

Posted by: Old Grouch in The Press at 16:21:00 GMT | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 285 words, total size 4 kb.

<< Page 4 of 24 >>
102kb generated in CPU 0.0553, elapsed 0.1653 seconds.
49 queries taking 0.1539 seconds, 198 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.