Friday, 07 August 2009

Rants

Hold on, maybe we’re wrong about Congressional Airlines...

RollCall had the early report:

Last year, lawmakers excoriated the CEOs of the Big Three automakers for traveling to Washington, D.C., by private jet to attend a hearing about a possible bailout of their companies.

But apparently Congress is not philosophically averse to private air travel:  At the end of July, the House approved nearly $200 million for the Air Force to buy three elite Gulfstream jets for ferrying top government officials and Members of Congress.

The Air Force had asked for one Gulfstream 550 jet (price tag: about $65 million) as part of an ongoing upgrade of its passenger air service.

But the House Appropriations Committee, at its own initiative, added to the 2010 Defense appropriations bill another $132 million for two more airplanes and specified that they be assigned to the D.C.-area units that carry Members of Congress, military brass and top government officials.
So the story is: “Three private jets (two extra): $200 million,” right?

Well, no.  There’s more...

The Wall Street Journal digs further:
Congress plans to spend $550 million[1] to buy eight new jets...

The Pentagon [had originally] sought to buy one Gulfstream V and one business-class equivalent of a Boeing 737 to replace aging planes.  The Defense Department also asked to buy two additional 737s that were being leased.

Lawmakers in the House... added funds to buy a total of three Gulfstream planes and two additional 737s on top of the Pentagon’s request...
In summary:


Pentagon
$
House
$
Gulfstreams
($66m each)
1
$66m
3
$99m
737s
($70m each)
3
$210m
5
$350m

4
$276m
8
$449m[1]

Demonstrating that, despite record deficits and economic crisis, the members of Congress still have their priorities in order:  Protecting their phoney-baloney perks.  To the tune of half-a-billion dollars.
Ellis Brachman, a spokesman for the House Appropriations Committee, said the changes were part of “Congress’s normal oversight responsibility” to make sure “the troops have everything they need,” upon which his nose sprouted to six feet long, and was promptly struck by lightning.
Oh, I added that last bit.


Elsewhere:
-----
[1]  The Journal says “$500 million” in its headline, “$550 million” in the body of the story. Using the Journal’s numbers, I can only account for $450 million (more or less), unless I’ve missed something.  Which still more than doubles yesterday’s number.  And besides, what’s $100 million, anyway!

Posted by: Old Grouch in Rants at 17:06:05 GMT | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 407 words, total size 7 kb.

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
71kb generated in CPU 0.0122, elapsed 0.122 seconds.
50 queries taking 0.113 seconds, 160 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.