Thursday, 09 April 2009

Bait?
Just days after declaring that they were mad as hell[1] and weren’t going to take any more websites and aggregators quoting or linking their stories without paying for them (and one day after issuing a takedown to one of their own affiliates over linking to a YouTube service it didn’t even know it was running),[2] the Associated Press (well, actually, Yahoo!) puts up this article debunking the conventional wisdom about smokers’ health care costs.
Now why do you suppose the AP would suddenly publish such an atypical-MSM story, one almost guaranteed to provoke comment, especially in the rightosphere?
Hmmm...?
Related:
------
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
Just days after declaring that they were mad as hell[1] and weren’t going to take any more websites and aggregators quoting or linking their stories without paying for them (and one day after issuing a takedown to one of their own affiliates over linking to a YouTube service it didn’t even know it was running),[2] the Associated Press (well, actually, Yahoo!) puts up this article debunking the conventional wisdom about smokers’ health care costs.
Now why do you suppose the AP would suddenly publish such an atypical-MSM story, one almost guaranteed to provoke comment, especially in the rightosphere?
Hmmm...?
Related:
------
[1] link to New York Times story, hosted at nytimes.com (requires cookies, sorry). Hey AP, bite me.
[2]comment to the TechCrunch story:
[2]comment to the TechCrunch story:
That would make a great slogan: “You can’t spell “EPIC FAIL†without A.P.â€
Posted by: Old Grouch in
The Press
at
18:19:17 GMT
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 147 words, total size 4 kb.
69kb generated in CPU 0.2407, elapsed 0.3221 seconds.
50 queries taking 0.3069 seconds, 182 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
50 queries taking 0.3069 seconds, 182 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.