Saturday, 12 March 2011

The Press

Not well done.

And why do they call it a “medium”? Dept
Tim Blair, looking for some earthquake coverage by the Australian Broadcasting Company:
The ABC’s 24-hour news channel is currently showing a four-month-old Pat Dodson speech about how Aboriginal reconciliation can help combat climate change.

UPDATE.  Now ABC 24 is running a review of the week’s major stories.  Old clips from Libya.

UPDATE II.  Unbelievable.  ABC 24 is now showing a three-year-old piece about Belgian identity issues.

UPDATE III.  Breaking news at ABC 24: a story about Lourdes … from 2008.

UPDATE IV.  Want earthquake information?  Here’s yesterday’s episode of One Plus One instead.  Mia Freedman talks about body image!

UPDATE V.  Two hours after the Japanese government upgraded the death toll to 600, ABC 24’s graphic still has it at 400.
And it doesn’t get much better...


LATER (110313): And once the coverage starts, where’s the context?
Okay, so what?  How “elevated” were those [radiation] levels?  Where do the “elevated levels” compare to a deadly level of radiation?  There is no context here and, as a result, we don’t know whether this is worrisome news or an outright disaster.
Back in the day, a good reporter’s Rolodex would have had phone numbers for real scientists who could answer questions like these.

Posted by: Old Grouch in The Press at 19:03:57 GMT | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 208 words, total size 2 kb.

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
67kb generated in CPU 0.013, elapsed 0.1386 seconds.
50 queries taking 0.13 seconds, 182 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.