Wednesday, 16 April 2008
Don't dine in Vancouver
Last night's Instapundit linked this Mark Steyn zinger at The Corner:
Still, only the most generous interpretation (the writer was being “lawyerly;†what he meant was, “McDonald’s failed to introduce any evidence of the relationship between food contaminatation and hand-washing, and therefore we couldn’t consider itâ€) excuses the Tribunal from a charge of bone-headedness. “No evidence of the relationship between food contamination and hand-washing†reeks[2] of the 60s view that personal cleanliness is “just another cultural artifact.â€[3] Given Vancouver’s social climate, there are probably many of its citizens who still hold this view.
Which means it’s probably a good idea for anyone who’d prefer to skip a round of food poisoning to avoid restaurants in Vancouver– until the situation is clarified.
------
[1] Excerpt from the Tribunal's finding (quoted in the HRhero post):
[2]Intended? - ed. Yep - o.g.
[3] See: hippies, smelly
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
Last night's Instapundit linked this Mark Steyn zinger at The Corner:
...The British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal ruled, after awarding a McDonald's employee $55,000:Great one-liner, though the underlying HRhero post reveals that the finding was more complex.[1]There was no evidence of:Thank goodness for that.
- the relationship between food contamination and hand-washing;
Still, only the most generous interpretation (the writer was being “lawyerly;†what he meant was, “McDonald’s failed to introduce any evidence of the relationship between food contaminatation and hand-washing, and therefore we couldn’t consider itâ€) excuses the Tribunal from a charge of bone-headedness. “No evidence of the relationship between food contamination and hand-washing†reeks[2] of the 60s view that personal cleanliness is “just another cultural artifact.â€[3] Given Vancouver’s social climate, there are probably many of its citizens who still hold this view.
Which means it’s probably a good idea for anyone who’d prefer to skip a round of food poisoning to avoid restaurants in Vancouver– until the situation is clarified.
------
[1] Excerpt from the Tribunal's finding (quoted in the HRhero post):
• The doctor said that [the complaintant, who had worked for the restaurant for 20 years before developing a skin condition] couldn’t tolerate “frequent†hand-washing and that she was to have “minimal detergent and water contact,†but McDonald’s didn’t inquire about how often she could wash her hands or what level of detergent and water contact was acceptable.
• There was no real attempt to see if any alternative work or modified duties were available... For example, McDonald’s didn’t explore the possibility of finding appropriately fitted gloves (e.g., “salad preparation glovesâ€) that [the complaintant] may have been able to use...
[2]Intended? - ed. Yep - o.g.
[3] See: hippies, smelly
Posted by: Old Grouch in
In Passing
at
16:21:18 GMT
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 266 words, total size 3 kb.
70kb generated in CPU 0.0211, elapsed 0.3012 seconds.
51 queries taking 0.2928 seconds, 200 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
51 queries taking 0.2928 seconds, 200 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.