Tuesday, 31 March 2009

In Passing

Time to boot Connecticut?


First they “gave” us Chris Dodd.

Next they “gave” us Richard Blumenthal.

Now it’s Rosa DeLauro.

Strike three. What say, “Connecticut, you’re outta here”?

(Maybe Quebec would take ’em?)

Posted by: Old Grouch in In Passing at 14:14:54 GMT | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 33 words, total size 1 kb.

In Passing

Government of MEN, not LAWS... oh, wait!


From NewsBusters:

[Glenn] BECK:  Is that [the AIG bonus payments] against the law?

[Connecticut Attorney General Richard] BLUMENTHAL:  Well, it is against public policy. And it is unsanctioned by law.

BECK:  Is that against the law?

BLUMENTHAL:  It should be against the law.

BECK:  Is it against the law?

BLUMENTHAL:  It’s against the public policy and against the taxpayer...In my view it is unrequired by law.

BECK:  It is a yes or no question. Counselor, it is a yes or no question.  Is it against the law?

BLUMENTHAL:  It is not against the law and I have never said that it is against the law, and I have never said that we would bring an action.

BECK:  Then you know what you should do?  You should enforce the law.  You shouldn't use your bully pulpit to gain popularity.
Unsurprisingly, Mr. Blumenthal is a Democrat.

Via: IP

Posted by: Old Grouch in In Passing at 13:19:44 GMT | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 144 words, total size 2 kb.

Friday, 27 March 2009

In Passing

More United Nations oxymoronism

...with emphasis on the “moron” part.

United Nations “Human Rights” Commission comes out against freedom of speech.

So tell me again why we continue to have anything to do with this bunch of losers? 
“Because getting beat up makes anti-American progressives feel good?
I see...


Via:  Don Surber

Posted by: Old Grouch in In Passing at 14:46:20 GMT | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 52 words, total size 1 kb.

Wednesday, 25 March 2009

In Passing

More power to ’em


This evening, Glenn linked a Wired article by Brendan Koerner, “Power to the People: 7 Ways to Fix the Grid, Now.”  It’s not a bad article, as such go, at least as a layman’s explanation of the issue.[1]  But it gets off on the wrong foot with this inaccuracy:

Go ahead, blame Edison.  He’s the guy who invented the business model that got us into this mess.  Edison Electric Light, founded in 1880, was a vertically integrated monopoly that controlled everything from generation to distribution.  (It even owned the bulbs in customers’ homes.) As utilities sprouted across the country, they saw no reason to deviate from Edison’s successful blueprint.
Well, not exactly.  Better to blame Elihu Thomson, Nikola Tesla and George Westinghouse.

You see, Edison’s system was Direct Current, and in those pre-transistor days, D.C. presented a problem:  Practical transmission of D.C. electric power was limited to a mile or so, because of cable resistance.  More than a mile, and the conductors had to be made so thick as to be impractical.  Oh, you could raise the transmission voltage, but higher voltage would be more hazardous, and there was no efficient way to knock a high transmission voltage down to something more suitable for consumer use.  So Edison’s central generating stations were limited to locations where the customer density was high enough to keep the transmission lines short.  For others, Edison’s “Company for Isolated Lighting” would install stand-alone generating plants.[2]

Westinghouse, on the other hand, championed an Alternating Current system.  A.C. could utilize high transmission voltages, even voltages greater than the generators produced, because A.C. voltages can be raised or lowered by using a simple, no-moving-parts device made up of two coils of wire wrapped around an iron core: the transformer.  The advantages were obvious, especially for locations that required long transmission distances or had low customer density.  When the famous Niagara Falls.power project went on line in 1895, it was equipped with Westinghouse A.C. generators.  Edison, on the other hand, continued to champion D.C., and came late to the A.C. party.

So Koerner gets it exactly backward (maybe he was too busy frothing at the Edison Company’s “vertically integrated monopoly”).  If we had continued to follow Edison’s original model, big generating plants would be found only in major urban areas.  Everywhere else you’d find small neighborhood plants, or generators whirring away in the basement.  The “grid,” if any, would be rudimentary.  And the efficiency problem would be far greater than the 7% grid transmission losses which (a different) Wired article decries.

The other irony is this:  For many 21st Century applications, D.C. is actually “better” power.  Electronic devices, computers, radios, and the like, use D.C. exclusively.  Electric heat and most types of lighting don’t care what kind of power they get; in fact A.C. lighting can produce stroboscopic effects that are annoying, and, in some circumstances, dangerous.  Only certain types of motors do better with A.C.  But D.C.’s advantages were swept away by A.C.’s efficiencies of large-scale generation coupled with long-distance transmission.

So in today’s home or office you can find a host of items whose first task is to convert the A.C. that comes out of the wall outlet into D.C., so they can do their jobs.


Suggested reading: Check out Maury Klein’s book The Power Makers (Bloomsbury Press, 2008) if you want to know more of the fascinating story of the electrification of America.   (The image above is a link to the Barnes & Noble product page.)

-----
[1]  Be sure you don’t overlook the “10 Ways” in the article’s sidebar. There are some good ideas, although the mix of too much command economics with an insufficient grasp of engineering realities bothers me.

[2]  One of the earliest (with its own boiler, steam engine, and dynamo) went into in the New York City home of J. Pierpont Morgan, which was too far uptown to be served by the Edison Company’s pioneering Pearl Street generating plant.

Posted by: Old Grouch in In Passing at 01:19:05 GMT | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 658 words, total size 6 kb.

Friday, 20 March 2009

In Passing

The List: Add Grassley, R-Iowa


First it was cheap demagoguery.

And now he’s co-sponsoring the Senate’s version of the bonus tax.[1]


Previously: The List.
-----

[1] Oh look, Olympia Snowe is a co-sponsor, too! How surprising!

Posted by: Old Grouch in In Passing at 16:00:45 GMT | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 35 words, total size 1 kb.

Thursday, 19 March 2009

In Passing

The Prime Minister’s Gift, Round 2


Unbelievable!!:

While not exactly a film buff, Gordon Brown was touched when Barack Obama gave him a set of 25 classic American movies – including Psycho, starring Anthony Perkins on his recent visit to Washington.
Yeah, we knew that...
Alas, when the PM settled down to begin watching them the other night, he found there was a problem.
No. Don’t tell me...
The films only worked in DVD players made in North America and the words “wrong region” came up on his screen.  Although he mournfully had to put the popcorn away, he is unlikely to jeopardise the special relationship – or “special partnership”, as we are now supposed to call it – by registering a complaint.
<Ballsy Announcer Voice[1]>
Going beyond parody, into the realm of farce, at the speed of light!!!
</Ballsy Announcer Voice>
A White House spokesman sniggered when I put the story to him and he was still looking into the matter when my deadline came last night.
“...sniggered...”!?!   RACIST!!!
(Erm, oops, Britishism.  Ahem.  Never mind!)
By the way, when Obama’s unlikely gift was disclosed, a reader emailed me to ask if Clueless was among the films.  Funnily enough, it was not.
At least somebody is finding cause for amusement.

Via:  SDB, who remarks:
Quite frankly, I’d rather be grinding my teeth in annoyance at his success in implementing policies with which I disagree, than to be flabbergasted by the sheer ineptitude he has been demonstrating.
I’m not quite to that point.  Not yet.   But it is rapidly approaching.


-----
[1]  I think perhaps three balls would be about right: As for voicing previews for the next space movie, or weekend drag race radio spots.

Posted by: Old Grouch in In Passing at 23:36:49 GMT | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 272 words, total size 3 kb.

Wednesday, 18 March 2009

In Passing

Yep, those federal centralized medical records will be *SO* helpful


Frank Munger:

Free medical screenings for workers at Oak Ridge and other Department of Energy sites have been put on hold while DOE investigates an incident in which personal information could have been compromised and establishes a new protocol for handling such data.

The incident involved a lost disc containing the personal information for thousands of current and former employees at DOE
s Idaho National Laboratory...

According to information provided by Queens [Queens College, N.Y., a participant in the screening program] and the United Steel Workers Union, which coordinates the screening programs at Idaho, the computer disc was reported lost Jan. 30. It was being shipped via UPS from Queens to the Center to Protect Workers’ Rights in Maryland.

Jim Frederick, the assistant director of health, safety and environment for the USW, said the disc contained the personal information for 59,617 current and former workers at the Idaho laboratory. That information includes names, social security numbers, dates of birth, and other personal data.

Via: Insty.

Posted by: Old Grouch in In Passing at 23:56:46 GMT | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 164 words, total size 2 kb.

In Passing

Did you vote for the stimulus bill?


I just saw a clip from this morning’s hearing [on the AIG bounses] where a congressman asked, “How could the government do something so stupid?,” apparently with complete sincerity. - “Dave E.,” in a comment at JustOneMinute

Posted by: Old Grouch in In Passing at 23:12:01 GMT | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 40 words, total size 1 kb.

In Passing

In the midst of life...


Was working up another post of cat links (seems to be a lot happening this week).

On checking in at Rahel’s, I found that the Missy, whose pictures I’d linked just five days ago, has died.




Cherish ’em while you’ve got ’em.


(I’ll hold the rest for later.)

Posted by: Old Grouch in In Passing at 15:57:46 GMT | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 53 words, total size 1 kb.

Tuesday, 17 March 2009

In Passing

We need somebody doing this...


S.Weasel
:

The peppery proprietor of Devil’s Kitchen has started to poke around the British world of fake charities, with a site called…ummm…Fake Charities.

Turns out, many of these organizations get, like, 1% of their money from real people donations.  The other 99% comes from government — either the British government or the European Union.  These are groups lobbying for things like higher booze prices or lower speed limits or restrictions on the internet.  Paid for with our money...

So. Government wants a law, government funds “charity,” charity recommends law.  Plus, many useless lefties with junk degrees get sweet jobs.  Bonus!
The entries for some organizations are quite interesting.  For example, consider Sustain: The Alliance for Better Food & Farming:
The charity is a modern-day “back to the land” charity that campaigns for people to consume less meat and milk in favour of more organic food and vegetables.  It opposes intensive farming, wants a ban on “junk food” advertising and claims that eating the “wrong” food causes mental illness.

According to its 2007 accounts, Sustain was given the following grants:
  • £120,289 from DEFRA
  • £55,100 from the Department of Health
  • £46,470 from the European Regional Development Fund
  • £17,000 from the Food Standards Agency
  • £13,739 from the London Sustainabilty Exchange
  • £12,000 from the Government Office of London
  • £7,000 from the Government Office of the South West
  • A further £99,581 comes from “other grants and income.”
This revenue amounts to more than half of the charity’s total income.  There is no record of any voluntary donations from the public.

Similar shenanigans occasionally come to light on this side of the pond,[1] but I’m not aware of any one-stop resource for tracking the “independent” groups involved.  Such a site would be most handy in vetting the objectivity of the source the next time some rewritten press release gets big play in the MSM.

Related:

-----
[1]  Besides lobbying the government to take away our liberty, many of these groups produce those mother-knows-best “public service announcements” that hector you to “do this” or “don’t do that” on local radio and television.

Posted by: Old Grouch in In Passing at 22:32:09 GMT | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 356 words, total size 5 kb.

<< Page 1 of 2 >>
101kb generated in CPU 0.11, elapsed 0.2073 seconds.
53 queries taking 0.152 seconds, 219 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.