Saturday, 07 February 2009

In Passing

Right move, wrong reason


“It’s Vintage, Duh”:

Does it seem to anyone else that quite a few GOP Congressmen/Senators are voting against the spendulus bill because the Dems didn’t let them help draft the disaster?  (As opposed to them voting against it because it’s a bad idea.)
Yep.  Unnamed (’cause I forget who)[1] Congress-critter was on local radio Thursday, carrying on about how “offensive” Obama’s talk of “bipartisanship” was when he appeared before the Republican reps  (as he knew that Peolsi had allowed no Republican input on the House version of the bill).

His talk left me with the strong impression that the stimulus bill might have been acceptable to the Republican caucus if it had included some Republican pork, and that some Republicans had intended to vote for it, but changed their minds when the President failed to give them “proper deference.”[2]  Sad.

-----
[1]  Turns out it was Rep. Steve Buyer (R-IN-5th District).

[2] 17:40. Cleaned up grammar in the second phrase this sentence in the interest of clarity.

Posted by: Old Grouch in In Passing at 17:21:40 GMT | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 167 words, total size 2 kb.

1 Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO, was on a local radio show this morning. The host reminded her of her pledge to vote against the porkulus bill if it contained "ear-marks." She waffled and said she had no ear-marks in it.

Supposedly, this exonerates her and she will now vote for it. Why am I not surprised when a democrat pol lies as a matter of course.

Posted by: Crucis at 02/09/09 18:19:20 (+U3Dh)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
69kb generated in CPU 0.6863, elapsed 0.8639 seconds.
53 queries taking 0.846 seconds, 202 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.