Saturday, 12 September 2009
Sometimes, revisions are necessary
Chris Muir has to make a slight correction:
Joanna is supposed to be there. I’ll expect a complete report!
LATER (090913 16:17): JorgXMcKie has a more reasonable estimate (“excess of 500,000â€), and explains his numbers. Still impressive.
MORE (090914 14:40): 240,000-500,000 at Rand Simberg’s (via IP). Assoiciated snark:
Elsewhere:
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
Chris Muir has to make a slight correction:
Joanna is supposed to be there. I’ll expect a complete report!
LATER (090913 16:17): JorgXMcKie has a more reasonable estimate (“excess of 500,000â€), and explains his numbers. Still impressive.
MORE (090914 14:40): 240,000-500,000 at Rand Simberg’s (via IP). Assoiciated snark:
This is the kind of analysis that it would be nice to get from journalists, but most of them went into the profession because (among other reasons) they were told there would be no math.STILL MORE (090917 15:30): Charlie Martin: Lower bound = 500,000
Elsewhere:
Open thread at Protein Wisdom
Open thread at Vodkapundit
Open thead at Ace of Spades HQ
Michelle Malkin: Celebrating the Rallies - UPDATE
Jim Treacher: Just imagine...
Ric Locke: TEA and Tee Vee, more
Open thread at Vodkapundit
Open thead at Ace of Spades HQ
Michelle Malkin: Celebrating the Rallies - UPDATE
Jim Treacher: Just imagine...
Ric Locke: TEA and Tee Vee, more
Posted by: Old Grouch in
In Passing
at
21:40:43 GMT
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 130 words, total size 4 kb.
70kb generated in CPU 0.0221, elapsed 0.4246 seconds.
51 queries taking 0.4159 seconds, 200 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
51 queries taking 0.4159 seconds, 200 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
