GW shark officially jumped

AFP:

British rock group Duran Duran and heavy metal band Scorpions are among 55 world celebrities who have joined in recording a song to draw attention to the global warming crisis, organisers said on Monday.

The song is part of a mass media campaign on the threats of climate change organised by the Geneva-based Global Humanitarian Forum, headed by former UN secretary general Kofi Annan....

The media campaign featuring the song is aimed at putting pressure on world leaders to reach an agreement on tackling climate change at a UN-sponsored conference in Copenhagen in December.

Wonder how much carbon they’ll emit on the way to the recording session?

Via: Robert

Posted by: Old Grouch in In Passing at 23:16:47 GMT | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 117 words, total size 1 kb.

Pelosi: “What did they do?”

Later, related (via Paco):  Going out in a blaze of bias.

Pelosi via JWF (via IP), Gibson via PJM.

Posted by: Old Grouch in In Passing at 16:07:40 GMT | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 33 words, total size 2 kb.

It’s not “journalism,” it’s political advocacy

Instapundit:

...They’re not trying to be objective journalists. They’re trying to be Hispanic journalists, which they clearly see as something different.

Related:

Posted by: Old Grouch in The Press at 14:47:11 GMT | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 48 words, total size 1 kb.

Hey kids, Shermlock is back!

LATER (090918 19:42), elsewhere:

Posted by: Old Grouch in Linkage at 16:49:18 GMT | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 21 words, total size 1 kb.

Clipfile - September 16, 2009

“Cats - too small to make into mittens, too large to be considered really safe.” - prob. anon., quoted by “Mikee”

Via:  Tam

Posted by: Old Grouch in Clipfile at 16:25:34 GMT | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 28 words, total size 1 kb.

Frank James: Suspicions confirmed

“Fraud One”:

You couldn’t find a bigger bunch of ‘posers’ if you had a combination Democratic party convention together with a Gay Rights Runway Fashion show in New York.

Posted by: Old Grouch in Linkage at 15:49:43 GMT | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 32 words, total size 1 kb.

The stuff of nightmares

“We've gone from Lyndon Baines Bush to Richard Milhous Obama...”

Posted by: Old Grouch in Linkage at 22:09:45 GMT | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 14 words, total size 1 kb.

“All I know is what I read in the papers”

Whatcha get for believing the Washington Post and the New York Times (via Daily Pundit, Mark Steyn, and USS Neverdock):

Sydney Morning Herald (Paul Sheehan):

A week ago, the Herald ran a story which, in its essence, was not true.  The paper did not know this.  It was the unwitting victim of a distortion created at The Washington Post, which produced the original story.  The Herald’s headline, which reflected the story, said: “Right-wing ‘lies’ force Obama adviser out”.

The story began: “The White House environmental adviser, Van Jones, a towering figure in the environment movement, has resigned after weeks of controversy stemming from his past activism … In a statement announcing his resignation, Jones said, ‘They [his critics] are using lies and distortions to distract and divide.’ ”

No.  The distortions have come from Jones.  Far from being “a towering figure in the environmental movement”, Jones was appointed to the Obama Administration despite a past as a hate-mongering Marxist who reinvented himself as an environmentalist to further his political agenda...

The Irish Times:

In her column in last Saturday’s edition, concerning the difficulties being faced by President Obama, Lara Marlowe said that Canadian commentator Mark Steyn accused Obama of trying to establish a “personality cult” like Saddam Hussein or North Korean leader Kim Jong Il.

This had been reported in the New York Times.  However, what Mr Steyn actually wrote was “obviously we’re not talking about the cult of personality on the Saddam Hussein/Kim Jong-Il scale.”

Posted by: Old Grouch in The Press at 20:41:51 GMT | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 258 words, total size 4 kb.

What buses?

In his Capital Journal column in today’s Wall Street Journal, Gerald Seib gets it nearly right about the TEA Partiers.^[1]  But only after he stumbles out of the gate:

The buses that rolled into the U.S. Capital over the weekend, carrying protesters steamed up about government spending and decrying the advent of “socialism,” may appear to represent a rich new vein in American politics.

Aside from the unfortunate metaphor (Is it the buses or the protesters themselves doing the representing?), his evocation of buses left my teeth on edge.

Because the image of protesters rolling in on buses carries with it the scent of astroturf:  The New York City ACORN operatives hauled to Connecticut to demonstrate outside the homes of bank executives, or the purple-shirted SEIU gangs who crowded out ordinary citizens at congressional Town Halls.  While I am certain that at least some of the TEA Partiers made their way to D.C. by bus^[4] (whether the faithful Greyhound or some deluxe motorcoach chartered by an opportunistic entrepreneur), I am also certain that the vast majority paid their own way.  “Buses... carrying protesters” skates uncomfortably close to dog-whistling the lefty meme that the TEA Partiers are shills financed by shadowy third parties, bought and paid for.^[2]

Seib’s attempt to view the TEA Partiers through the lens of Ross Perot’s Reform Party also seems a bit of a stretch.  For one thing, the Reform Party (at least by the time Perot ran for president) was largely a top-down operation (with Perot its out-front face).  The TEA Parties began- and remain, despite Glenn Beck- bottom-up locally driven.  Yet the assumption of similarity encourages top-down analysis of a bottom-up movement, with its resulting misunderstandings.

There are several times he almost gets it: “Perotistas” were angry at George H.W. Bush, the TEA Partiers’ anger targets Barak Obama.  True, as far as it goes.  But by limiting the target to the current president (ignoring the long-building anger at the RINO Republicans), and defining that anger as

...alternat[ing] between suspicion of government in general... and the idea that government seems to be doing more to help fat cats or the other guy

Seib dodges the fact that the TEA Partiers have the entire political-media-educational establishment in their sights, and ignores their fear of that establishment’s malevolence as a motivator

We don’t like having to fight desperate battles to save our freedom and future from socialist politicians every ten or twenty years...  We’re tired of checking the papers each day, to see which group of us has been targeted as enemies of the State.^[3]

Thus, although it may be doubtful (as Seib says) that

... many of the senior citizens on the buses want their Medicare coverage turned into a voucher program...

what is not doubtful is that those senior citizens are worried about winding up losers once the dust settles on whatever medical care “reform” the establishment deigns to foist upon them.

He’s also only half there on the TEA Party attitude toward government spending: The TEA Partiers may be “more vocal about the level of spending, less about the way it’s being financed” than Perot’s followers, but that is because most of Perot’s Reformers had accepted the proposition that big government would be With Us Always, leaving “How do we pay for it?” as the only question.  TEA Partiers want a less-expensive, less-intrusive, smaller federal government, and they see bailouts, ACORN grants, industry-takeovers, and earmarks as ideal candidates for the chop.

And he pulls the usual WSJ trick of (vaguely) casting the TEA Partiers’ calls for enforcement of immigration laws as evidence of xenophobia:

[It is] ...doubtful...[that they] share the view of many economic conservatives that the country benefits overall from immigration.

This is unworthy of honest reporting, but, again considering the Journal’s previous performance on this issue, unsurprising.

Where Seib does get it 100% right is in his warning to the Republicans:

Republicans who think they can harness Tea Party Patriots and their anger may be in for a rude surprise...

...as they find themselves gleefully tossed out the door with the rest of the hack politicians. [And I added that last part.]

Overall, I’d score this one “6 out of 10, go read Doc Zero (footnoted below) and Victor Davis Hanson.”

Oh, and what’s with the scare quotes around “socialism”?


-----

Posted by: Old Grouch in In Passing at 17:51:00 GMT | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 767 words, total size 8 kb.

Here comes the trade war

Elsewhere:

Posted by: Old Grouch in In Passing at 15:55:47 GMT | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 57 words, total size 2 kb.