Saturday, 26 March 2011
Conceived as a competitor to Apple’s market-dominating iPod line, the Zune added an HD Radio receiver in 2009, making it one of only two portable HD radios available. The other comes from the Best Buy Insignia house brand, which has a touch-screen making it look like an MP3 player, even though it’s only a radio.So should the Zune HD disappear (likely, as the series hasn’t received a hardware update since 2009), that will leave precisely one portable HD receiver on the market. Not exactly indicative of any overwhelming demand for the service.
It appears that Microsoft will retain the Zune brand which includes a music store platform accessible on the XBox games system and Windows smartphones. But none of those devices includes HD Radio reception.
A couple of months back I asked a manager of one of the local public radio stations (one which runs two multicast channels, as well as its main HD-1 service) if he had any idea how many HD receivers - of any type - were actually in use by real listeners in our market.
His answer: “More than nine.â€
Previously:
A new fancy radio - without HD
“Potemkin village†demos for HD radio
Marketing triumph (not)
Stupid Stupid Stupid - #4 of a series
Big radio shoots itself in the foot (again)
Posted by: Old Grouch in
Radio
at
17:05:04 GMT
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 263 words, total size 4 kb.
Thursday, 24 March 2011
On the drive in, noticed a yard where both the forsythia bushes and a (I guess) flowering crabapple tree are already in bloom. The forsythia ought to survive, but those crab blossoms aren’t likely to handle multiple consecutive nights of sub-freezing temperatures.
Elsewhere:
LATER (110326): The forecast at Dustbury is “slightly variable.â€
Posted by: Old Grouch in
Dear Diary...
at
16:51:11 GMT
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 93 words, total size 2 kb.
Wednesday, 23 March 2011
Posted by: Old Grouch in
Linkage
at
18:39:53 GMT
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 11 words, total size 1 kb.
One side is totally blocked, no flow at all. The other side, it ends up in my throat.What... you mean that’s not...??
Oh, wait...
Ahem,
Elsewhere:
Posted by: Old Grouch in
Linkage
at
17:46:58 GMT
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 42 words, total size 1 kb.
Instapundit links a New York Times story on how relief efforts by the U.S. military[1] are helping to strengthen Japanese-American ties. The Times reporter notes one wrinkle:
At the crowded refugee center in Minamisanriku, where 250 survivors slept on the floor, Mr. [Osamu] Abe [local official] said the most urgent thing needed was medicine for colds, fever and allergies. But the American airmen said they could not hand out medicine without the permission of the Japanese government, which they did not have.That brought to mind another example, from yesterday’s Wall Street Journal(“Main Obstacle Stalling Aid: A Severe Shortage of Fuel†by Kanna Inagaki, Eric Bellman, and Toko Sekiguchi, link not available):
Something similar happened after the deadly Kobe earthquake in 1995, when foreign medical supplies and even doctors were turned away at the border by Japanese bureaucrats.
This time, the Americans promised to ask the Japanese for quick permission to hand out American-made medicine, and for help in translating the directions into Japanese.
In one city that lost hundreds of residents from the tsunami, all but two gas stations were destroyed. Officials received barrels of gasoline from Japan’s Self Defense Force but had no facility licensed to handle the flammable material. City officials are pumping gas into emergency vehicles wht a hand cranked pump in the back of their emergency headquarters.Glenn comments:
“We have no choice but to take this extraordinary measure,†said one local official, who asked not to be named or placed for fear of having their makeshift gas station closed by authorities.
The consensus-based Japanese bureaucracy doesn’t seem to deal with emergencies as well as with peacetime.Well, I don’t have a lot of confidence that our homegrown officials would perform much better under the same circumstances. Fortunately, there are still parts of America where bureaucratic obstructionism in the face of disaster would be met with a smartly-delivered smack upside the head.
----
Posted by: Old Grouch in
In Passing
at
16:10:44 GMT
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 322 words, total size 4 kb.
Monday, 14 March 2011
Last Thursday’s Investor’s Business Daily carried an editorial (“Light, Liberty, And...â€) praising Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) and her Light Bulb Freedom of Choice Act (HR.849). I agree: Any effort to overturn 2007’s infamous incandescent-lamp ban – a goal that’s item #1 on Jeff’s list – is certainly praiseworthy.
But the devil, as usual, lies in the details. And it turns out that the details in HR.849 don’t actually repeal the ban. Instead, they attempt to block the ban’s enforcement by imposing some “impossible†conditions:
...Bachmann’s Light Bulb Freedom of Choice Act would rescind the CFL mandates unless three conditions are met. First, the bulbs must show “net savings in the combination of monthly electric bills and expenses for new light fixtures to accommodate the new required bulbs.†... Then it must be proved that mandated use of CFLs “will reduce CO2 emissions by 20% by 2025.†... Finally, it must be shown that “there are no public health risks from the mercury in replacement bulbs at home or in any public building.â€So should HR.849 pass, the ban wouldn’t be eliminated altogether; instead it would survive as subterranian cruft, waiting to be awakened as soon as somebody at the GAO can be convinced to say, “Go!â€.
The GAO [General Accounting Office] would make these determinations, but Bachmann believes they can't be satisfied.
There are two things wrong here:
First, at a time when we have an Environmental Protection Agency that declares carbon dioxide a “hazardous pollutant,†and an Attorney General who is blind to voter harassment provided it’s done by “his people†the Black Panthers, should we trust unelected (but politically-aware) bureaucrats to continue to agree that “conditions†are not met, no matter how “impossible†they might be?
And second, the bill itself shows that in her third term Bachmann has gone native- succumbing to the dreaded D.C. Tinkering Syndrome. Because
This same thing would have happened with last term’s HR.968, the failed attempt by John Shadegg (R-AZ) (and 23 cosponsors) to do something about the horrible unintended consequences of 2008’s Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act. Instead of eliminating the problem provisions and replacing them with something sensible, the HR.968 authors spent twelve-hundred-some words over 53 paragraphs in carving out a series of “small business†exemptions.[1] The problem: The bad parts of the existing legislation would have remained, still ready to nail any business that might ever grow “too big†to be “small.â€.
It’s almost as if there’s an Iron Law of Washingon Power: Once assumed, power is never relinquished, and the best we peons can hope for is that our “representatives†might act to minimize the horrors.
As one IBD commenter noted,
The bill [HR.849] should read: “Americans can buy whatever kind of light bulb they want.†... We don’t need another politician or lawyer, just action: direct and simple.
Indeed. Direct and simple appeals to me: Up-or-down votes on legislation that says what it means. Not this endless patching and trimming that creates so much undergrowth that eventually no one, including the people who pass the laws and those who have to enforce them, can really know what the law is. And I’m especially fed up with legislation so obscurely-worded that gives hiding places for both its supporters and its opponents.
Although Bachmann isn’t on the list, she still couldn’t make HR.849 a 1-sentence bill. That, along with the disappointing performance of Republican leaders on the budget, shows that when it comes to changing the attitudes in Washington, our friends there haven’t quite “got it†yet, and we voters still have much to do.
-----
Posted by: Old Grouch in
In Passing
at
19:45:21 GMT
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 658 words, total size 8 kb.
Great news! Now, back to that good old theater popcorn!
Posted by: Old Grouch in
Linkage
at
16:02:20 GMT
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 19 words, total size 1 kb.
“Would they have reported these threats if they were made against Democrats?â€
(Via: Insty)
Related:
“Yeah, please go, why don't you? You are useless reporters.â€
NYT caption wilfully obscures that the mob overran the police last night and took over the building.
Posted by: Old Grouch in
The Press
at
02:59:25 GMT
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 66 words, total size 2 kb.
...want to climb all the way up there and fix that.
That looks like a 6-bay VHF radiator, probably 100' or so tall. And that’s at the top of a 1000-foot tower.
Via: Culture Japan via Brickmuppet via SDB.
Previous tower stuff:
Posted by: Old Grouch in
Linkage
at
02:26:27 GMT
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 73 words, total size 2 kb.
Sunday, 13 March 2011
Related: Tam’s take
Posted by: Old Grouch in
Clipfile
at
20:49:54 GMT
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 23 words, total size 1 kb.
56 queries taking 0.3984 seconds, 229 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.