Tuesday, 03 August 2010
Better read the fine print first...
Breitbart thinks he got a correction:
Via: Insty.
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
Breitbart thinks he got a correction:
The Political Times column last Sunday, about a generational divide over racial attitudes, erroneously linked one example of a racially charged statement to the Tea Party movement. While Tea Party supporters have been connected to a number of such statements, there is no evidence that epithets reportedly directed in March at Representative John Lewis, Democrat of Georgia, outside the Capitol, came from Tea Party members. - The New York TimesAndrew celebrates, but over at PJM, commenter Mark Buehner says you’d better parse it like Pravda in the old days:
This wasn’t a correction- it was a further calumny.So nothing to see here, folks. Might as well move along.A REAL retraction would explain that there is no evidence, despite mounds of video and audio evidence, that any racial slur was uttered by anyone that day. This pile of garbage was a non-apology apology that managed to make further unsupportable claims.
- They make an unsupported allegation about other tea-party racist statements. That’s what got them into this mess.
- They imply (quite strongly) that somebody made racist statements at the capital… but they just can’t prove 100% that they were teapartiers. Wink.
Via: Insty.
Posted by: Old Grouch in
The Press
at
22:12:09 GMT
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 201 words, total size 2 kb.
68kb generated in CPU 0.0734, elapsed 0.3266 seconds.
51 queries taking 0.3186 seconds, 207 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
51 queries taking 0.3186 seconds, 207 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.