Friday, 03 August 2007

A look at the tape
There's been a discussion of the Minneapolis bridge failure over at Steven Den Beste's. In the comment thread, "ubu" linked to his post at Houblog, in which he pointed out some signs of structural failure near the center of the span that appear early in the security camera video. [That last link not verified: I can't do video on this computer.]
In the interest of experimentation, I grabbed the two frames he posted, and overlayed them using The Gimp. The striking thing is that in the time between the first and second frames, the entire right section of the structure dropped what looks like about 10-15 feet. Here's an animation:

It's important to note what you're not seeing here: This is not a sequence of images. It is a "fade" from the first image ubu captured to the second one. Still, the effect is quite pronounced. From this, it appears to me that the buckling in the deck and the deformation of the arch (green arrows) are both results of whatever happened off-camera to the right, but, as ubu points out, failure at the center of the arch could have pushed the bridge's near "feet" off of their concrete piers. (Although the vertical members don't appear to move shoreward at all, they wouldn't have had to move very much.)
So we speculators are not a lot nearer the answer than before. Guess we'll have to await the verdict of the experts. Still, the image is interesting, and I thought I'd share it.
----
UPDATE and linkage 070803 16:37: Materials engineering glossary by "notfromaroundhere." Hattip to commenter "FOH," who posted the link in this comment thread at buzz.mn.
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
There's been a discussion of the Minneapolis bridge failure over at Steven Den Beste's. In the comment thread, "ubu" linked to his post at Houblog, in which he pointed out some signs of structural failure near the center of the span that appear early in the security camera video. [That last link not verified: I can't do video on this computer.]
In the interest of experimentation, I grabbed the two frames he posted, and overlayed them using The Gimp. The striking thing is that in the time between the first and second frames, the entire right section of the structure dropped what looks like about 10-15 feet. Here's an animation:

It's important to note what you're not seeing here: This is not a sequence of images. It is a "fade" from the first image ubu captured to the second one. Still, the effect is quite pronounced. From this, it appears to me that the buckling in the deck and the deformation of the arch (green arrows) are both results of whatever happened off-camera to the right, but, as ubu points out, failure at the center of the arch could have pushed the bridge's near "feet" off of their concrete piers. (Although the vertical members don't appear to move shoreward at all, they wouldn't have had to move very much.)
So we speculators are not a lot nearer the answer than before. Guess we'll have to await the verdict of the experts. Still, the image is interesting, and I thought I'd share it.
----
UPDATE and linkage 070803 16:37: Materials engineering glossary by "notfromaroundhere." Hattip to commenter "FOH," who posted the link in this comment thread at buzz.mn.
Posted by: Old Grouch in
In Passing
at
15:38:23 GMT
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 270 words, total size 3 kb.
68kb generated in CPU 0.0142, elapsed 0.4442 seconds.
51 queries taking 0.4212 seconds, 207 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
51 queries taking 0.4212 seconds, 207 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.