Wednesday, 04 February 2009
Bounce ’em
The major argument for a flat tax is its simplicity: Innocent bystanders aren’t as likely to be ensnared by some random complication.
Daschle and Geithner are not a “good argument for a flat tax.†They’re a good argument for turning the “elites†out of power.
Elsewhere:
Via: IP
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
Victor Davis Hanson misses the point:
If the liberal Secretary of the Treasury and the even more liberal would-be HHS Secretary did not pay their proper taxes, owed tens of thousands in back taxes, and (apparently) were only willing to address this issue when it was a matter of career advancement in Washington, what does that say about our honor-based tax code?And just why should we expect them to pay a flat tax? These weasels apparently didn’t even attempt to pay what they owed.
...
Any more of these stories and we will be on very dangerous ground, since the message is a terrible one to the American people: You pay your full amount, but our elites not only do not, but won't unless they get caught.
This is all about as good an argument for a flat tax as one can imagine.
The major argument for a flat tax is its simplicity: Innocent bystanders aren’t as likely to be ensnared by some random complication.
Daschle and Geithner are not a “good argument for a flat tax.†They’re a good argument for turning the “elites†out of power.
Elsewhere:
Via: IP
Posted by: Old Grouch in
In Passing
at
17:38:08 GMT
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 203 words, total size 2 kb.
68kb generated in CPU 0.0464, elapsed 0.1999 seconds.
51 queries taking 0.192 seconds, 207 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
51 queries taking 0.192 seconds, 207 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.