Friday, 09 August 2013
How about ‘‘each pays his own way?’’
Hey, I’ve got this revolutionary idea...
------
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
Subsidies for Me, but Screw You Dept
Over at Instapundit, we have:...which links to:... while eliminating debit cards would be a drastic move by the banks, you would more likely see the end of things like ‘‘free’’ checking.So let me see: A system under which all customers pay higher prices[1] so that some people[2] get free checking accounts is supposed to be a good thing?
The reason for this is ‘‘interchange fees’’. Or, more precisely, price controls on interchange fees. Interchange fees are the fees banks charge retailers for processing the use of debit cards. The interchange fee used to be about 1.35% of the amount purchased at the retailer. This enabled banks to cover the costs of debit cards and offer other perks such as ‘‘free’’ checking.
Because the price of the interchange fee may soon be set at .03-.06 cents per transaction, banks have to figure out another way to cover their costs. Say welcome back to fees for checking.
Hey, I’ve got this revolutionary idea...
------
[1] You don’t think that retailers eat the interchange costs, do you?
[2] ...who don’t even have to be customers of those retailers...
[2] ...who don’t even have to be customers of those retailers...
Posted by: Old Grouch in
In Passing
at
17:32:15 GMT
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 197 words, total size 3 kb.
69kb generated in CPU 0.0949, elapsed 0.3558 seconds.
51 queries taking 0.3478 seconds, 207 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
51 queries taking 0.3478 seconds, 207 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.