Wednesday, 30 December 2009

In Passing

The “Protest Culture”

The Best Commentary is Often In the Comments  Dept

Those who lean toward viewing the administration’s lapses as stemming from incompetence rather than malice[1] may find this pair of comments[2] by “cfbleachers” a useful hook on which to hang their explanation:
We (at least, those of us in the center or rightward part of the political spectrum) still expect our government to respond in a strong and reflexive manner against any declared enemy who attempts mass murder of our countrymen.

But this current administration is made up of individuals belonging to a “protest culture.”  If they have a reflex, it is toward not away from, other protest cultures.

When actions by the current leadership seem incongruous to us, we must remember that they are the outcome of their own worldview.  Try viewing them through the eyes of an American “Protest Culture Club” member and things will crystallize.

To be fully cognizant of the impact of each step in the process, understand that there is an even further left, lefter, leftist spot on the protest culture spectrum.  Michael Moore not only views the war on terror to be a ridiculous notion, he considers our sworn enemies to be heroes.  And Ward Churchill believes that the innocents who died on 9/11 to be “little Eichmanns”.

Most (not all) of those nominated or selected for positions in this administration don’t go quite that far.  The “inner circle” seem to be quite content to stop at watering down the “enemy” to merely a “fellow protest culture, that, through circumstance, has us as its main target”.

PC responses are not just political correctness any longer, but rather, are protest culture guidelines. 
Example: Protesting sometimes leads to raised emotions;  occasionally some individual gets so wrapped up in “fighting the establishment” that he gets carried away and commits a violent act.  But (so the thinking goes) we don’t want to condemn a whole “group” of Protest Culture participants for the acts of a tiny minority.  Instead, the ones who “gets out of hand” in “expressing themselves” should be handled within the confines of policing and “keeping order”.

Therefore, you don’t prepare in advance, because it is not a war.  You react after the fact, like calling the police…to keep order.

And…you search for “root causes.”  (Like blaming Bush, which is basically the “original sin” of the religion of Protest Culturists.)  Apply this mindset to every…every…instance, where this administration said or did something that caused you to shake your head in disbelief.

And, in the future, expect more the same.  If the reaction by the masses is too strong, expect lip service to what our eyes consider normal.  Then, watch every action/reaction revert to precisely the same as before.

We are living under the rule of a leadershp of Protest Culture club members: This is what it looks and feels like.  And if you are not a member, YOU…are more the enemy, than those who mean to kill us.

Remember, O. referred to “the alleged” perpetrator. “Alleged”??? Tell that to the passengers and the Dutchman who subdued him. “Alleged”?? In that one word the President conveyed all the subtext we need to know.
This is the difference between seeing a combatant caught in the act of guerilla warfare against us, and a “protest culture” participant engaged in an act against “the establishment”.

You would never say that an “alleged” soldier, was firing an “alleged” weapon from an “alleged” clock tower, at our men in uniform, on an “alleged” theater of operations.

When you start to “lawyer up” the defendant for his “misdemeanor” of trying to mass murder 300 or more of our countrymen, you come up with some pretty mind-bending, pretzel twisting phrases to water down the act to fit the alternate reality of the protest culture.
o-o-O-o-o

...20% of the population (or less) accounts for the vast majority of the Protest Culture.  However, that 20% DOMINATES the Democratic leadership, legacy media, academia, hollywood and entertainment.

And being in a constant mental state of protest (it being their reflexive response, as opposed
to, say, patriotism), explains why one would fake weather data, why one would need to “redistribute” wealth by invasive hidden tax mechanisms, why one would overhaul the nation’s health care system to shred the elective options for the sick and elderly, why one would champion Mao, Che, Fidel (all seen as comrades in arms, not as brutal dictators).

It explains Van Jones, it explains Mike Klonsky, it explains William Ayers.  And Frank Marshall Davis.

It explains the New Party.

It explains the comment about “not being proud”, it explains the comment about “bitter clingers”.

It explains the reaction to the Gates altercation with the police and it explains the Ft Hood and Detroit Nigerian Nightmare situation reaction…such as it was.

It explains the flag pin as the “wrong kind of patriotism,” and the no hand over the heart for the Pledge of Allegiance.

It explains the Apology Tour and the deep bows to Arab princes.

What it doesn’t explain, is how 80% of the country allowed our culture to be swarmed by the pervasive effects of this in every corner where we disseminate our information and form our opinions and get our facts.


-----
[1] If you favor malice, try here or here

[2] Taken from the comments thread for this post at Pajamas Media. Quoted pretty much in their entirety, with a bit of editing for clarity.  The originals are here: 1.2

Posted by: Old Grouch in In Passing at 17:08:28 GMT | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 906 words, total size 8 kb.

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
72kb generated in CPU 0.06, elapsed 0.2417 seconds.
51 queries taking 0.2058 seconds, 207 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.